Until recently I have had a switch feeding my Windows computer and Aastra VoIP phone into the back of my iMac, which would then send the data to my router over the 802.11n connection. This was a really bad way of doing things, since my Trixbox server (running on the Windows computer) lost all connections when my iMac went to sleep.

Why was I doing it this way? Because my router is on the other side of the apartment by my cable modem, and there is no cable connection in my office area. I could have run an ugly wire over to the router, but I wasn’t really interested in a blue wire going across the apartment.

Now I have had other choices to create an 802.11g connection using what companies call a “Gaming Bridge” which allows you to link two ethernet ports over a wireless connection, but I have had bad luck with those in the past and I really wanted to stay on my primary 802.11n connection.

A few days ago Apple answered my request. They have released an 802.11n version of the AirPort Express and it works just like their original 802.11g device did (before it burnt out on me in a puff of smoke). All I had to do was tell the device to connect to my .11n network and allow computers to use the connection over the built in ethernet port. I then hooked that ethernet port into a switch that feeds my Windows box and Aastra phone. That’s all it took to get them on the network!

So if you’re running an 802.11n network in the 5GHz range and want to provide network access to a room without running a bunch of wires through walls (or can’t because you’re in an apartment like me), this is a logical choice at a price of $99.

However if you are not keen on Apple products, Netgear also has a product that can perform similar actions for a slightly higher cost. The one drawback with the Netgear product is that you won’t get the same additional features (like AirTunes and USB Printer Sharing) as you will get with the AirPort Express.

I just got back from a nice vacation from work where I did nothing but relax. Now I am in for a 10-day work week until my next day off (helping to cover some days we’re short) and am not sure what my mental status will be by my next day off.

Also I am working on a new lab addition and hope to announce it soon. It’s a little different than I have done before, but is a simple project that should take no more than a day or two.

Today I looked at the new iPhone features built into Dashcode, Apple’s development environment that was originally created for Dashboard Widgets. Upon loading the application, I was presented with three new iPhone development options: Custom, Browser, and RSS.

Development

While Custom is going to give you a blank template to work with and Browser gives you a basic list view for you to fill in with your own content, the RSS template provides you a pre-coded environment to add your RSS feed and publish to your website. Today I decided to make my own iPhone version of this website.

Just like creating a Dashboard widget, you have the ability to change fonts, colors, image, and much more. Using the predefined template, I modifed the colors and background to match the look and feel of the full site you’re probably viewing this on right now. Having only used Dashcode once before to create a Podcast widget for OS X, I found no issues creating a mobile website for the iPhone. All the menus and toolbars are the same, though the library of items you can add to your mobile site are different (for good reason, of course).

As you develop your iPhone mobile RSS page, you can test it inside of the Aspen Simulator — an iPhone running on your computer (I mentioned this in the last entry). Each time I made a major change to the operation of the mobile page, I would click on the Run button, view it inside the Simulator, and operate it just like it’s on my mobile phone.

Deployment

Once I was satisfied with my changes, I went to the file menu inside Dashcode and clicked on the Deploy option. I then chose to save it to my desktop where I would be able to take it and upload it to my website.

After upload it to the labs.blackice912.net site, I decided to launch it on my actual iPhone to see the results. It turns out the results were pretty bad. No news loaded at all. I then tested it inside the Simulator and got the same results. Why was it working on my computer but not once I published it to the internet?

Well after activating the debug mode inside of Mobile Safari, I found out why. As I should have remembered, you cannot have JavaScript on one site grab data from another site. It is cross site scripting and can be considered dangerous. Realizing this, I moved the code over to blackice912.net and launched it with success.

So are there ways to use a RSS feed that is hosted on another site and use it? With the addition of PHP, yes you could do this and not run into that issue.

Conclusion

Apple has really done a lot of things right with this new SDK. While I still need to do some more investigation into the native application side of it, I am impressed with what I have seen today. You can really create a powerful web application with the SDK today and an even better one once the 2.0 firmware hits phones in June.

If you’re interested in seeing the mobile site I created, visit blackice912.net/mobile on your iPhone/iTouch or in Safari. It will not load properly in any other browser!

Today Apple released the iPhone SDK, which will allow developers such as myself to program native applications for the iPhone. What wasn’t given a lot of attention during the keynote held this morning was all the new opportunities for web developers.

I’ve only had the chance to watch a 20 minute video on the subject, but the new iPhone firmware upgrade coming in July will bring support for additional WebKit features like animation and iPhone specific functions like gestures

I hope on doing some more research into this tomorrow using the published SDK’s Simulator and publishing sample projects to the labs site.

Apparently there was an issue viewing videos inside of Internet Explorer. I have tracked down the issue and corrected it. My apologies to all the viewers who were unable to view any posted videos.

While I’m not writing this to inform you about ways to scare friends and family, the title could be true if the following idea was used in a sinister way.I am working on creating a very clever security system in my apartment. This is mostly for fun, but it does have practical applications. More on that when I spend more money on the project.

As a part of this security system, I want the ability to talk (or spook) to whoever is in my apartment. If I get a message that my door has been opened, I want to give the intruder the sense that there is someone around and completely aware of what is going on. There are other practical applications too, such as monitoring kids while you’re away to make sure they aren’t in a yelling match or make sure the babysitter isn’t being a bad example.

I figured the best way to provide an example of this was to show it in action. I have recorded a video which shows me calling a telephone number and Trixbox kicking into action. I will explain how this is done after the video:

So how does one pull off something like this? Well first you need to make sure that your Trixbox has an inbound telephone number (you can get a cheap 800 number from sites such as Vitelity) so that you can actually interact with your system. Once you have that figured out, you need to add a custom extension in the extensions_custom.conf file. An example entry would look something like this:

[custom-intercom]
exten => s,1,Set(__SIPADDHEADER=Call-Info: \;answer-after=0)
exten => s,2,Set(__ALERT_INFO=Auto Answer)
exten => s,3,Set(__SIP_URI_OPTIONS=intercom=true)
exten => s,4,ChanIsAvail(SIP/4587&SIP/9321,js)
exten => s,5,Macro(user-callerid,)
exten => s,6,Dial(Local/4587@from-internal,,A(beep),)
exten => s,105,Macro(vm,4587,BUSY)
exten => s,106,Wait(5)
exten => s,107,Macro(hangupcall,)
exten => s,hint,SIP/4587&SIP9321

In the above example (which was originally posted on the Trixbox forums by another user), 4587 is the extension I am calling and putting into speakerphone/intercom mode, while 9321 is the extension I am calling from.

After you have the code added to extensions_custom.conf, you must add a Custom Destination. If you were to use the above code, your custom destination would be something such as:

custom-intercom,s,1

Now you can finish up by adding a new inbound trunk and setting the Caller ID Number to your mobile phone number and setting the call destination to your new Custom Destination you just setup. This will make sure that calls will only go to intercom/speakerphone mode when you call and allow all other calls to route normally.

The above method is pretty secure unless someone figures out your mobile number and the phone number associated with Trixbox, as many VoIP services allow you to enter fake caller id information (which can be useful in the correct and honest conditions).

If you have questions or corrections to this entry, please let me know by leaving a comment. Also if you’re tempted to call the number listed in the video: I registered it for this video and it has since been decommissioned.

If you have tested the latest addition to the labs (see: New lab added: Live Mail), you would have noticed that there is a captcha (human verification) used to protect against bots creating e-mail addresses for worldwide domination. I could have created my own captcha in PHP, but I decided to use reCAPTCHA.

What’s so special about reCAPTCHA? Well in addition to protecting your registration, comments page, e-mail address, or wiki, it also helps the Internet Archive with it’s project of scanning old books for reading and archiving. Every time you use reCAPTCHA for verification, you’re helping to correct a word that was scanned into a computer but could not be read correctly by that system’s OCR (Optical Character Recognition) software.

If you’re interested in helping out a great site like the Internet Archive, I’d suggest checking this out. reCAPTCHA is compatible with various development languages and web applications such as WordPress.

On a previous entry I spoke about Trixbox and how you can turn it into a weapon to protect yourself against unwanted calls (see: Trixbox can help stop those annoying calls). Though Trixbox excels at disrupting incoming calls from telemarketers on dedicated equipment, it also works decently well in a shared environment.

As my cell phone is all I need for making calls these days, I don’t have a standard telephone connection in my apartment. Regardless, it can be nice to have the functionality of Trixbox so I currently have it installed on a Windows XP box that acts both as a casual gaming computer and a Trixbox PBX using Microsoft Virtual PC 2007.

Usability

If you have no need to keep your PBX server running 24 hours a day, a shared computer is a cost effective way to go. While the hardware you’re running it on and amount of free memory can provided mixed results for the response time to your commands on the web-based interface and playback of built in audio files/voicemails, the actual call quality is just like any other installation - crystal clear.

To actually handle my calls. I have an Aastra 480i CT and a few cordless handsets. This phone is a great multi-line device with a full screen that can pull up custom designed web pages (once used to remotely control my iTunes software). I had no issues with getting this device to talk to the virtual installation of Trixbox, as Virtual PC 2007 acts like it’s just another computer out on the network by having a unique IP address that is not affected at all by the host computer’s firewall. The 480i CT also excels at plug and play in a Trixbox environment — I just had to tell Trixbox to assign the phone’s MAC address to a specific phone extension. After that I just plugged the phone in, waited a minute for it to boot up, and watched as it gathered the configuration data from the server.

So a question in my mind as I write this is: Would a software based phone provide the same amount of quality? I can’t see why not. As long as computer resources don’t put an intense amount of strain on both the host computer and the virtual PBX server, it should be fine. Or you can pick up a cheap GS-101 if you don’t need a fancy phone, but prefer using a handset over a computer microphone.

Connections

When I had a full PBX server, I had a FXO card so I could interface with the standard POTS (phone company) line and a VoIP link so I could get to the outside world when the POTS line was in use. In my current setup I just have a VoIP link.

Could the FXO card work in a virtual server setup? I can’t really answer that since I don’t have the FXO card installed in the computer, but I tend to be thinking that it could not work. Virtual PC 2007 shares various types of hardware - keyboards, mice, audio cards, and display adapters…but it does it in a way that you have to use specific Virtual PC drivers to access some of that hardware to get the most use out of it.

Virtual PC 2007 comes with special drivers if you install a Windows based operating system inside of it that will improve the speed and functions of that virtual operating system. As Trixbox runs in Linux, we do not have the option to take advantage of those drivers. Thankfully Trixbox is aware enough to access the virtual network card and other basic essentials.

So until I have the chance to install the FXO card again, that will be a mystery…but not an issue. My VoIP link is all I will ever need for this system.

Right now I have VoIP service through a company called Vitelity Communications. While their initial startup cost is higher than many other providers, their call and telephone number rates are some of the best I’ve found. The initial cost (as of this post) that gets turned into an account credit is $35. You can also add an 800 number for around $0.50 a month.

Setting up Vitelity inside of Trixbox is the same as configuring any other VoIP service. You add a trunk (SIP or IAX) with the specific login information that your VoIP provider supplies you and route calls through that trunk.

Issues & Reliability

Now, as I mentioned earlier, there are issues with the output of voice prompts and voicemail messages. When you play back a voicemail or try to navigate through an IVR, the audio is playing back at about half the speed it should be. I recorded an example that you can listen to below:

Other issues, such as internet latency and issues with your host operating system, could also cause issues with your call quality and VoIP server performance. If you’re going to use a PBX server for full time use, I would recommend dedicated equipment and a FXO card to connect your system to the local POTS service.

Virtual PC 2007, while an excellent free application from Microsoft, is not without fault. While so far I haven’t run into any serious issues, I did notice that if I interact with the application (right click on its icon, for instance), the virtual operating system will stop processing any functions. This can cause some issues (such as with the system time), but hasn’t been something that I have had to worry about yet.

Summary

If you’re interested in testing the waters of VoIP and Trixbox, this is the cheapest way to do it. You’re not going to get the best setup and you may run into issues like I have spoken about above, but it could be a good starting point to see if you’re at all interested in building a dedicated box and routing your calls full time over Trixbox.

Also the best support you are going to get for your Trixbox installation is at the official forums. There are many highly skilled and certified Trixbox users there who know more about the system and how it works than I ever will.

If you have any questions or corrections to something I have mentioned in this piece, please leave a comment and let me know.

Today, after much work to convert my code that relied on Neowin’s backbone to help control the system, I have added my system which ties into Windows Live Custom Domains (see: Windows Live Custom Domains Is Cool) and allows you to create a custom e-mail account that is powered by Windows Live Mail.

This registration application gives you the chance to see how you can integrate Windows Live Mail into your site by giving your visitors an e-mail address that has some relation to your domain. At Neowin we provide a variety of domain name choices for members and some exclusive ones for subscribers. All of our e-mail domains have the Neowin name in them and provide recognition of our site to the users who exchange messages with these e-mail address.

If you don’t want to invest resources into running a full e-mail server but want to offer extra site service, Custom Domains is the way to go.

Feel free to give the Live Mail registration a try at the labs site: Live Mail @ blackice912 labs

Who will be the winner? Time will tell…hey, is that dust?